Jan. 5, 2004 12:00 AM
With a statewide drought
deepening and bark beetles killing pines in wide swaths of
some Arizona mountain towns, municipalities are starting to
get tough on letting dead and dying trees hang
around.
Last week, the state's most draconian law
mandating tree removal took effect in Show Low.
| advertisement |
 |
|
|
 |
In
effect, if anyone complains about dead trees on private
property, that property owner has about two months to remove
the trees or find himself or herself in municipal court. The
new ordinance defines a public nuisance as all trees infected
with diseases, parasites and insects like bark beetles. Bark
beetles have killed an estimated 1.1 million acres of forest
statewide during the past two years.
That follows on
the heels of another ordinance passed in neighboring
Pinetop-Lakeside that gives homeowners two years to remove all
flammable forest materials within 10 feet of homes, followed
by two years to remove such dead fuels within 30 feet and two
additional years to thin land within 100 feet of homes. "This
drought isn't even providing enough water for non-dense stands
of trees," said Steve Campbell, a University of Arizona
cooperative extension agent who is a liaison to Navajo County.
"We've got 30 to 40 percent mortality of trees in the western
and northern parts of Show Low. It's a very serious situation,
and action has to be taken now."
Not that people in
these parts didn't already know that. The state's largest
wildfire ever, the "Rodeo-Chediski" fire, burned to within
one-quarter mile of western Show Low in the summer of
2002.
But many people in Show Low are complaining about
how quickly they must remove their dead and dying trees and
the high price tag involved. Even just one tree near a
structure can cost $800 and up to remove.
"No one is
denying that these trees need to be removed. But for them to
demand this to happen so quickly and the cost that's involved
really affects our personal liberty," said Show Low
businessman Dennis Owens, whose family owns about 150 acres in
the city limits. "A few years ago, they enacted an ordinance
that you couldn't cut down trees over 6 inches in diameter,
which really made the problem we have now a lot
worse."
Owens' mother, Joy Owens, said she thinks Show
Low should get its own house in order and do its own thinning
on land it owns before coming down on private landowners.
"It's too bad they can't do like other cities and help
the people who live here," Joy Owens said, referring to a
tree-removal project in Prescott during the past
year.
Jeremy Brinkerhoff, a Prescott Fire Department
official, said that fire crews cut down more than 10,000 trees
within the city limits in the heavily beetle-infested area and
charged homeowners $50 a tree for removal.
"That
program has been phenomenally successful, but we still have a
lot of problems with dead trees in the (Yavapai) county areas
near Prescott," Brinkerhoff said.
Campbell acknowledged
that there was a price-gouging problem on the part of some of
the 20 contractors removing trees in the Show Low area.
Campbell said that he is putting on a one-week program in
March about the forest crisis and will include a section on
ethics and "not taking advantage of people."
Campbell
said that the Show Low area has received $700,000 in federal
money to do necessary cutting and that an additional $1
million has been approved for southern Navajo County from the
recently passed Forest Health Initiative in
Congress.
"This problem is so big that it's going to
take 30 years to fix it," Campbell said. "I take the position
that the private property owner has a responsibility to invest
something in this process."
Reach the
reporter at mark.shaffer@arizonarepublic.com
or (602) 444-8057.